[1]王天竹,马鸿飞,周小燕. 基于利益相关者的企业社会责任与竞争力相关性的实证研究[J].科技与管理,2015,17(06):13-20.[doi:10. 16315 / j. stm. 2015. 06. 003]
 WANG Tian-zhu,MA Hong-fei,ZHOU Xiao-yan. An empirical study on the relationship between corporate social responsibility and enterprise competitiveness based on the stakeholder theory[J].Science-Technology and Management,2015,17(06):13-20.[doi:10. 16315 / j. stm. 2015. 06. 003]
点击复制

 基于利益相关者的企业社会责任与竞争力相关性的实证研究
()
分享到:

《科技与管理》[ISSN:1008-7133/CN:23-1445/C3]

卷:
17卷
期数:
2015年06
页码:
13-20
栏目:
发展战略
出版日期:
2015-11-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
 An empirical study on the relationship between corporate social responsibility and enterprise competitiveness based on the stakeholder theory
文章编号:
1008 -7133( 2015) 06 -0013 -08
作者:
 王天竹 马鸿飞 周小燕
 哈尔滨理工大学 管理学院
Author(s):
 WANG Tian-zhu MA Hong-fei ZHOU Xiao-yan
 School of Management,Harbin University of Science of Technolgy
关键词:
 利益相关者 企业社会责任 企业竞争力
Keywords:
 stakeholder corporate social responsibility enterprise competitiveness
分类号:
F 270
DOI:
10. 16315 / j. stm. 2015. 06. 003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 以我国 2011—2013 年沪深两市 419 家制造业上市公司为样本,从利益相关者视角出发,对企业社会责任与竞争力关系进行实证研究。研究结果表明,企业对股东、供应商、债权人的责任与竞争力呈现显著正相关关系,而企业对员工的责任与竞争力的相关性不显著,企业对消费者的责任与竞争力呈负相关关系。试图通过研究帮助企业树立社会责任意识,使企业认识到承担社会责任能够转变为自身一项新的竞争优势,为企业社会责任与企业战略相结合提供理论支持,从而给企业发展带来新的契机。
Abstract:
 This paper started from the perspective of stakeholders,the datum of 419 manufacturing companies from Shenzhen and Shanghai in the year from 2011 to 2013,were adopted to conduct empirical research for corporate social responsibility and competitiveness. The result showed that corporate social responsibility had a positive correlation with shareholders,suppliers,and creditors. Corporate responsibility to employees didn’t have significant rele-
vance to enterprise competitiveness. Corporate responsibility to consumers had the negative correlation with enterprise competitiveness. This article aimed to help enterprises to establish the sense of social responsibility,making enterprises realize that taking social responsibility could be transformed into a new competitive advantage,which provided theoretical support for combining corporate social responsibility with corporate strategy.

参考文献/References:

 [1] BRAGDON J,MARLAN J. Is pollution portable[J]. Risk manage-
ment,1972 ( 19) : 9 - 18.
[2] PORTER M E,KRAMER M R. Strategy and society: The link be-
tween competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility
[J]. Harvard business review,2006( 12) : 78 -92.
[3] SHRIVASTAVA. Economic management for a risk society[J]. A-
cademy of Management Review,1995,20 ( 1) : 118 - 137.
[4] LUO,BHATTACHARYA. Does doing good always lead to doing
better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility [J].
Journal of Marketing Research,2001: 2 - 3.
[5] PORTER M E.On Competition[M].Harvard Business Press,2008.
[6] RICHEARD W. A competitive scenario modeling system [J].
Management Science,2013 ( 3) : 261 - 273.
[7] 王晓巍,陈慧. 基于利益相关者的企业社会责任与企业价值关
系研究[J]. 管理科学,2011 ( 6) : 29 -37.
[8] 周小虎,陈传明. 企业社会资本与持续竞争优势[J]. 中国工业
经济,2004( 5) : 90 -96.
[9] 谢佩洪,周祖城. 中国背景下 CSR 与消费者购买意向关系的实
证研究[J]. 南开管理评论,2009,12( 1) : 64 -70.
[10] 朱爱武. 论企业社会责任与提升企业竞争力的关系[J]. 企业
经济,2006( 1) : 34 -36.
[11] 周晨. 中国上市公司企业社会责任的竞争优势战略属性研究
[J]. 华东经济管理,2010( 4) : 111 -117.
[12] FROOMAN J. Socially Irresponsible and Illegal Behavior and
Shareholder Wealth [J]. Business Society,2012 ( 36 ) : 221
- 249.
[13] ARCHIE B C. Corporate social responsibility: evolution of a defi-
nitional construct[J]. Business Society. 1999,38: 268.
[14] 卢代福. 企业社会责任的经济学和法学分析[M]. 北京: 法律
出版社,2002: 96.
[15] 谢光亚,崔君. 北京企业竞争力分析: 基于结构方程模型和国
际竞争力指标的研究[J]. 科技管理研究,2013( 16) : 38.
[16] 金培. 中国企业竞争报告[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社,
2011: 18 - 23.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 收稿日期: 2015 -02 -03
基金项目: 黑龙江省科技厅攻关软科学项目( GD10D204)
作者简介: 王天竹( 1990—) 女,硕士研究生;
马鸿飞( 1957—) 女,教授,硕士;
周小燕( 1989—) 女,硕士研究生
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-03-15